Camera

Aputure NOVA 9° 2×1 Tunable White LED Light Panel Review

Aputure NOVA 9° 2×1 Tunable White LED Light Panel Review


The Aputure NOVA 9° 2×1 Tunable White LED Light Panel was announced back in January, along with the NOVA II.

The NOVA 9° 2×1 is a hyper-narrow beam panel and uses the same accessories as the NOVA II 2×1. The Aputure NOVA 9º 2×1 is a high-output, lensed LED panel that uses the same accessories as the NOVA II 2x. It was designed to replicate the power and precision of natural sunlight in a compact, portable form factor. Featuring an ultra-tight 9º native beam angle and a BLAIR chipset, the NOVA 9º 2×1 delivers exceptional long-throw performance, enabling filmmakers to project crisp, directional beams and hard shadows across great distances with remarkable intensity and control.

Screenshot 2026 01 27 at 16 46 47

At 5 meters, the NOVA 9° 2×1 is claimed to be twice as bright as a 5,000W tungsten fresnel at full spot (28,090 lux vs 14,920 lux). The light draws 800W.

Key features

  • For Studio & Film/TV Production
  • Output: 29,730 Lux at 16.4′ (9º, 5600K)
  • 1800-20,000K CCT; BLAIR Chipset
  • Plus/Minus Green Adj.
  • 27.2 x 15.3″ Panel; AC Power
  • CRI 95 | TLCI 95 | TM-30 Rf 95, Rg 100
  • Onboard, DMX/RDM, CRMX & Art-Net/sACN
  • Fan Cooled & QuickClip Front-Mounting
  • IP65-Rated Weather Resistance
  • Includes Yoke, Flat Diffuser & Cable

We first saw this product at NAB 2026 back in April. Above, you can see my interview with Mitch Gross.

The Aputure NOVA 9° is a very unique fixture and quite different from anything else that is on the market that has a power draw of below 1000W.

Size & Weight

DSC 1711

There is no way of sugar-coating the fact that this is a very heavy light. It weighs in at 20.45 kg / 45.08 lb (light, yoke, & power supply), which may sound like a lot for a 2×1-sized fixture, but it’s far from an anomaly. With its weight, it is still manageable to lift and operate by a solo operator, but you should always be careful when lifting this sort of weight.

DSC 1681

Like the ARRI SkyPanel X21 and Creamsource Vortex8, the power supply is incorporated into the light, but there is stilWhile I like panel lights with built-in power supplies, it does make the actual light a lot heavier and you, therefore, need to make sure that you use heavy-duty light stands.

How does this weight compare to some other high-end 2×1 full-color lights?

WEIGHT
Aputure NOVA 9° 20.45 kg / 45.08 lb*
Aputure NOVA II 18kg / 39.68 lb**
KNOWLED P1200R Hard PRO 22kg / 48.5 lb**
Godox KNOWLED P600R Hard Pro 13kg / 28.7 lb
ARRI SkyPanel X21 18kg / 39.7 lb**
Creamsource Vortex8 15.6 kg / 34.39 lb*
ARRI S60-C SkyPanel 17 kg / 37.47 lb*
Rotolight Titan X2 14.3 kg (31.52 lb)**
Litepanels Gemini 2×1 10.1 kg / 22.26 lb**
Litepanels Gemini 2×1 Hard  11.5 kg / 25.3 lb**
Z CAM ZOLAR Vega 80C 20 kg / 44.1 lb**
SUNNYXIAO CO2P 12.5 kg / 27.55 lb**
Lupo UltrapanelPRO Full Color Hard 60 9 kg / 19.8 lb**
Luxli Taiko 8.96 kg / 19.75 lb**
Velvet EVO 2 7.57 kg / 16.7 lb**
Nanlux Dyno 650C 15.8 kg / 34.8 lb**

*Weight includes power supply and yolk frame.

** With standard yoke

As you can see, the weight of the Aputure NOVA 9° is fairly similar to a lot of other high-end 2×1-sized fixtures.

BLAIR Light Engine

The NOVA 9° utilizes a version of the BLAIR Light Engine that was first introduced with the STORM 1200x. BLAIR was the direct result of Aputure acquiring Prolycht.

DSC 1712

The BLAIR Light Engine utilizes blue, lime, amber, indigo, and red, LED emitters. This is quite different from RGBWW or RGBACL. Lights that utilize RGBACL don’t use any white LEDs, instead, they mix all of those different color LEDs to produce white light, and that’s essentially what BLAIR is doing too. Instead of having a green emitter, they are utilizing indigo.

Aputure decided to call it BLAIR because they wanted to avoid the alphabet soup confusion of other RGB variants. Regardless of whether you like the name or not, it is easier to remember.

The NOVA 9° 2×1 uses Aputure’s BLAIR with Extended Red light engine. The choice of BLAIR instead of BLAIR-CG is based on the expected use-case. The NOVA 9° has such a tight beam that its intended use is as a sunbeam or other white light source. It is unlikely to be used for some extreme saturated color effect. BLAIR gives more lumens per watt when used for white light, as it is not wasting capacity trying to hit extreme saturated colors. So this gives the light more punch. Aputure’s use of Extended Red is to better cover the red part of the spectrum with multiple emitters for improved skin tones. Multiple red emitters also help increase overall output. 

The NOVA 9° is a full-spectrum white light, and Aputure claims that it has excellent CRI and SSI. It is claimed to deliver a better-quality white light to fill out the color spectrum while offering greater adjustability. The calibrated Indigo is said to enhance fluorescing materials, resulting in a higher quality white light that better matches natural daylight and black body sources such as tungsten quartz.

Adding Indigo is very interesting because the light it emits is right at the edge of our visible spectrum, and that is why engineers probably haven’t thought about doing it before; that was until now. But why Indigo? Well, not all objects or surfaces reflect light; some of them absorb it. What Aputure engineers found is that by adding an Indigo emitter, certain materials and objects retained their natural brightness and color. In practice, this actually makes quite a noticeable difference. In some of the examples I have seen, you can certainly see its benefits. The benefits will be more noticeable when using the light at daylight CCT setting as opposed to tungsten.

The human eye is only really capable of detecting wavelengths from 380 to 700 nanometers, and most LED lights don’t contain any information below around 420 nanometers. The BLAIR light engine adds information right out to 405 nanometers.

The NOVA 9° is claimed to have the following photometric scores:

  • CR I≥ 95
  • TLCI ≥ 95
  • SSI (Tungsten) 89
  • SSI (D56) 86
  • TM-30 RF (Average) 95
  • TM-30 RG (Average) 100

Hive Lighting has been using 7 LED-chip blending. Instead of the traditional 3 colors, Hive uses red, amber, lime, cyan, green, blue, and sapphire. Companies like ARRI and Kelvin are using RGBACL, while a lot of other lighting companies are using RGBW and RGBWW.

We have seen everything from RGBW/RGBWW to 6-color systems (RGBLAC), to Aputure’s BLAIR CG, NANLUX’s new C8 Full Color Light Engine, which is claimed to be the industry’s first eight-color light engine, the Profoto CORE-6 RGBWWW LED Engine, and Godox’s PaletteLab, which is claimed to deliver full-spectrum performance across the entire visible wavelength range. PaletteLab is made up of 9 separate color diodes.

There is a lot of debate and argument over what color engine is better, but at least in my opinion, all of the new lighting engines produce excellent results.

Aputure does have another version of BLAIR called BLAIR CG, which is used in the STORM C fixtures. Along with the blue, lime, amber, indigo, and red emitters, it also has additional cyan and green emitters.

How did they arrive at BLAIR?

KeyVisual SSI Full 16x9 1200x 1

Instead of just making incremental improvements, Aputure got to the point where they asked themselves what are we are trying to do, and what are the problems we are trying to solve. They wanted to come up with a better mousetrap and not just build another existing one. This led them to look at different ways of coming up with an alternative solution to what was already available. Aputure received a lot of feedback from Art Directors, make-up artists, etc. that things just never seemed to look quite right when trying to replicate daylight sources.

With LED lights, replicating tungsten has always been a lot easier than replicating daylight. A lot of LED lights, when used at daylight CCT settings, never quite look right. The color of skin tones, fabrics, etc., can look slightly off. This led Aputure to re-look at the spectrum to see what was missing.

What Aputure found is that there was a discord between measuring colors with a meter and seeing what actually happened when it came to light being reflected and absorbed by colors. Certain surfaces reflect light, and others absorb it, and then there is another group that reflects back light that is different from what is hitting it. This can lead to differences in color and brightness. This discovery led to what Aputure believes was the key ingredient that was missing in the color engine, Indigo.

Probably the best way to describe it is that if you were to shine an incandescent UV light at an object, you could see how bright that reflected light is compared to the light being emitted from the source.

If an LED light doesn’t have a certain frequency that is contained in UV light, it won’t look the same. This is why so many LED lights struggle to replicate daylight sources, because up to now, those frequencies weren’t being generated by the light engine. Why engineers didn’t see this in the past is because they believed that these frequencies weren’t visible to the human eye, but what they were overlooking was that the reflected light from these frequencies was visible.

Now, some other companies have been using an extra blue emitter in their light engines to help replicate better daylight sources, and while that may sound similar to what Aputure is doing, it isn’t exactly the same. Companies like Maxima are using technology to add more information out toward the edges of the spectrum, but it’s not the same as what Aputure is now doing.

Build Quality





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *