NANLITE FC-720C Review – Newsshooter

In the Effects mode, you can choose from a wide selection of different effects, and you can make adjustments.

I like how you can save presets and then have them categorized. This makes recalling settings very easy to do.

The app is straightforward and reasonably easy to use; however, there are still some quirks with it. If you are running the light and you have the fan turned off or set to low speed, the app will still show the output as 100% even though it is not. I am not sure why Nanlite can’t seem to be able to fix this, as I mention it in almost every review.

Beam Angle

The beam angle of the fixture, when used open face, is 75°, which is narrower than the FC-500C, which has a beam angle of 120°. If you use the light with its included reflector, it is 55°.

The included reflector is very similar to the ones that you get with most NANLITE Bowens mount fixtures.

A native beam angle of 75° is reasonably tight. However, in comparison, the amaran Ray 660c is also 75°, the NANLUX Evoke 600C has a beam angle of 65°, and the Aputure 700x has a native beam angle of 58º.

Photometrics

So now let’s get to the photometric results. I always test lights in this way so that I get a reference to how they compare to other fixtures. Results only tell part of the story and should never be used alone to judge a light. I have found from extensive testing over the years that certain lights that have good photometric results don’t always look good, and lights that have worse photometric scores can sometimes look better than their results indicate.

You can’t judge a light from one set of photometric results. You have to look at all of the different results to be able to come to a conclusion.

Different lights can also look different depending on what camera you happen to be using.

Output & Color Temperature Accuracy

I tested the NANLITE FC-720C at a variety of CCT settings with a Sekonic C-800 Spectrometer to find out how much output the light had and how accurate the Kelvin color temperature reproduction was. All readings are taken at a distance of 1m (3.28ft) in a controlled environment. The readings were also taken directly from the lighting source. In the case of using the light with the Reflector or softbox, the readings were taken from the end of the attachments.

Above, you can see the claimed output figures from the manufacturer.

Open Face

Let’s first look at the light when it is used open face.

NANLITE FC-720C 5600K (Open Face)

Above, you can see that the FC-720C recorded an output of 47,700 lx (4430 fc) when set at 5600K and used open face.

The light recorded a CCT reading of 5731K, which was a decent reading.

NANLITE FC-720C 3200K (Open Face)

Above you can see the light’s output when it was set at 3200K in the open face configuration was 43,700 lx (1580 fc), which is just 8.03% less than the 47,700 lx it produced at 5600K.

As far as CCT accuracy goes, it recorded a very accurate reading of 3178K.

Summary of results (Open Face)

Above, you can see a summary of results when the light was used open face at various CCT settings.

The results show me that the light’s CCT accuracy when used open face was pretty good across its CCT range, except at 10,000K. The output was pretty consistent at most CCT settings except for when it was used at 2500K.

So how does this compare to the NANLUX Evoke 600C, Profoto L600C, and NANLITE FC-500C when it is used open face? I have also added the amaran Ray 660c, but I haven’t tested this light, so these are manufacturers’ quoted figures that I can’t independently verify

*Manufacturers claimed output. Not independently tested.

Reflector @45°

So, now let’s see how much output the light has when used with its Reflector @45°

NANLITE FC-720C 5600K Reflector @45°

Above you can see the light’s output when it was set at 5600K with the standard reflector was 92,100 lx (8550 fc). It is important to note that this measurement was made 1m/ 3.3′ from the end of the reflector.

This is a ton of output from a light this size using a reflector.

As far as CCT accuracy goes, it recorded a very good reading of 5649K. This was a better reading than the 5731K it recorded when used open face.

NANLITE FC-720C 3200K Reflector @45°

Above you can see the light’s output when it was set at 3200K with the standard 45° reflector was 85,100 lx (7910 fc), which was 7.6% less than what it output at 5600K.

As far as CCT accuracy goes, it recorded a reading of 3109K, which was a good result.

Summary of results (45° reflector)

Above, you can see a summary of results when the light was used with its 45° reflector at various CCT settings.

The results show me that the light’s CCT accuracy when using the standard 45° reflector was excellent. The output was pretty consistent from 3200-8000K, but the light does have a bit less output at 2500K and 10,000K.

So how does this compare to some of the competition, and the more expensive EVOKE 600C, when they are used with their reflectors?

If you want to see how those figures compare to some more lights, I have put a table below:

5600K

Below you can see how the output of the NANLITE FC-720C compares to some HMI fixtures at a distance of 3m.

Please note that the readings from the two K 5600 Lighting options and the ARRI M8 and M18 are claimed figures. I haven’t independently tested these lights.

While the NANLITE FC-720C is quite different from a light like the Joker2 and M18, at least you can get some idea of how its output compares.

NANLITE FC-720C 5600K Reflector @45° Fan Low Speed

Above you can see the light’s output when it was set at 5600K with the standard 45° reflector, and with the fan set to Low was 49,500 lx (4600 fc), which was 46.25% less than what it output with the fan set to Smart or Max.

As far as CCT accuracy goes, it recorded a reading of 5669K, which was an excellent result.

NANLITE FC-720C 5600K Reflector @45° Fan Off

Above you can see the light’s output when it was set at 5600K with the standard 45° reflector, and with the fan set to Off was 12,100 lx (1100 fc), which was 86.82% less than what it output with the fan set to Smart or Max.

As far as CCT accuracy goes, it recorded a reading of 5702K, which was an good result.

DoPchoice Octa Softbox (3′)

As this is a light that is likely to be used with lighting modifiers such as softboxes, let’s have a look at the output and CCT accuracy when using a DoPchoice Octa Softbox (3′).

NANLITE FC-720C DoPchoice Octa 3′ Softbox (two layers of diffusion) 5600K

Above you can see the light’s output when it was set at 5600K and used with a DoPchoice Octa Softbox 3′ with two layers of diffusion was 9520 lx (885 fc). This was a ton of output for a configuration like this.

As far as CCT accuracy goes, it recorded an excellent reading of 5266K, which was 334K from being correct.

NANLITE FC-720C DoPchoice Octa 3′ Softbox (two layers of diffusion) 3200K

Above, you can see the light’s output when it was set at 3200K, with a DoPchoice Octa Softbox 3 using two layers of diffusion was 8650 lx (803 fc).

As far as CCT accuracy goes, it recorded an excellent reading of 2987K, which was 213K off being correct.

The FC-720C produces a ton of output when using the DoPchoice Octa softbox 3′.

+/- Green adjustment

As the fixture includes +/- Green adjustment, you can quite easily correct any tint. While there is no exact science to this, and it really depends on what camera you are using as well, it’s just a matter of trial and error to see what setting actually works the best. The nice thing is, any light with +/- Green adjustment can be fine-tuned to deliver better results.

CCT consistency & linear output when dimming the light

Now, what you should always do when testing lights is to see if the CCT remains consistent when dimming the light. Just because you set a light at say 5600K, that doesn’t mean that the CCT will remain stable as you start dimming the fixture down. I also wanted to see how linear the dimming curve was.

I decided to do a series of tests at 100%/75%/50%/25%10% to see if the CCT being recorded changed. This was done at a distance of 1m / 3.3′ using a Sekonic C-800. These tests were done at 5600K with the light being used with its Reflector.

NANLITE FC-720C Reflector @45° (Linear Dimming)

The NANLITE FC-720C maintained excellent CCT consistency as you start dimming the fixture. My testing showed that the CCT readings varied by just 77K from 100% to 10%.

As far as how linear the output is when you start dimming the light, at 50% output, it had 42.35% less output than when used at 100%. At 25%, it had 67.20% less output than when used at 100%. At 10% output, it had 85.99% less output than when used at 100%. This shows me that the light’s linear dimming curve could be better.

Color Rendering

So now that we have seen how much output the NANLITE FC-720C produces, how does it perform when it comes to replicating accurate colors?

NANLITE FC-720C 5600K (Reflector @45°)

Above, you can see that when the light was set at 5600K, using the 45-degree reflector recorded an average CRI (R1-R8) of 95.5 and an extended CRI (R1-R15) of 93.18. For replicating accurate skin tones, it recorded 92.6 for R9 (red), 98.7 for R13 (closest to caucasian skin tones), and 98.3 for R15 (closest to Asian skin tones). These were decent results, but both R10 (Yellow) and R12 (Blue) were below 90. The score for R12 (Blue) was pretty low for a modern LED fixture.

The light, when set at 5600K using its Reflector, recorded a TLCI score of 94, which was a little low for a modern LED light.

NANLITE FC-720C 3200K (Reflector @45°)

Above, you can see the scores for when the light was used at 3200K. It recorded an average CRI (R1-R8) of 98.7 and an extended CRI (R1-R15) of 95.42. For replicating accurate skin tones, it recorded 97.4 for R9 (red), 98.5 for R13 (closest to caucasian skin tones), and 99.3 for R15 (closest to Asian skin tones). These were very good results, and only R12 (Blue) was below 90.

These results were very good and almost as good as when the light was used at 5600K.

The light, when set at 3200K, recorded a TLCI score of 95.

How do these figures at 3200K and 5600K compare to other lights that we have previously reviewed? Below you can see:

5600K

The scores were decent for the NANLITE FC-720C, but they were lower than more expensive fixtures that use more sophisticated lighting engines.

3200K

The scores were excellent for the NANLITE FC-720C at 3200K, and it wasn’t far behind much more expensive fixtures with more sophisticated lighting engines.

NANLITE FC-720C 5600K (Open Face)

Above you can see that when the light was set at 5600K and used open face recorded an average CRI (R1-R8) of 95.6 and an extended CRI (R1-R15) of 93.39. For replicating accurate skin tones, it recorded 95.5 for R9 (red), 98.7 for R13 (closest to caucasian skin tones), and 98.2 for R15 (closest to Asian skin tones). These were decent results, but R10 (Yellow) and R12 (Blue) were both below 90.

The light, when set at 5600K and used open face, recorded a TLCI score of 95.

NANLITE FC-720C 3200K (Open Face)

Above, you can see that when the light was set at 3200K using the standard reflector recorded an average CRI (R1-R8) of 96.5 and an extended CRI (R1-R15) of 95.20. For replicating accurate skin tones, it recorded 97.3 for R9 (red), 98.1 for R13 (closest to caucasian skin tones), and 99.1 for R15 (closest to Asian skin tones). These were excellent results, and only R12 (Blue) was below 90.

The light, when set at 3200K and used open face, recorded a TLCI score of 96.

CC Index & ⊿uv

The CC Index displays the CC correction value and whether any magenta or green need to be added or subtracted. 1 CC corresponds to 035 Kodak CC values or 1/8 Rosco filter values. Any reading less than +1.00 or -1.00 and you’re probably not going to need to make any kind of adjustment. The ⊿uv is the value to show how much this light is away from being an ideal light source (black body radiation = incandescent lamp). As with the CC Index you want this number to theoretically be zero. Kelvin is not a linear value, so we need to convert from Kelvin to MK-1 to compare the values of color temperature. To calculate from Kelvin to Mired is MK-1= 1*1000000/Kelvin. While this may sound confusing, it is the only way of measuring if the Kelvin shift is significant enough to warrant having to use a filter for correction. Below are the results for the NANLITE FC-720C:

NANLITE FC-720C Vs MK-1 (Reflector @45°)

These figures might look confusing, but what they tell me is that the light is extremely CCT-accurate from 4500K to 10,000K. The only real anomaly was at 3200K, where the light was way off. Any MK-1 score that is under -9/9 means you wouldn’t have to use any color correction gels. The MK-1 scores for this light were extremely good, apart from 3200K.

NANLITE FC-720C CC INDEX & ⊿uv (Reflector @45° )

The ⊿uv scores were some of the most consistent I’ve ever seen from an LED light. The CC Index scores were also very good from 2500-6500K.

TM-30

TM-30 is a relatively new color rendering standard that was developed to deal with the limitations of CRI. TM-30 looks at 99 individual colors. These 99 colors are categorized into seven groups: nature, skin color, textiles, paints, plastics, printed material, and color systems.

TM-30 scores go from 0 – 100. The higher the score, the more accurate a light is at producing colors. Any TM-30 Rf score in the ’90s is considered to be good. What is interesting and something that you need to be very aware of is that two separate light sources with the exact same CRI scores can render colors very differently. A light with a high CRI rating could have a low TM-30 score. Conversely, a light with a good TM-30 score could have a bad CRI score.

Now, there are two measurements associated with TM-30, Rf and Rg.

Rf (Color Fidelity)
Rg (Color Gamut)

With Rf value, ideally, you want a score in the 90’s.

With Rg value, a score below 100 indicates that the light source renders colors with less saturation than the reference source. So ideally, you want this score to be above 100.

Above, you can see the scores for the NANLITE FC -720C at various CCT settings. Below, I have listed the figures as well.

Here are the results:

	Rf	Rg
2500K	95	105
3200K	94	103
4500K	92	102
5600K	91	102
6500K	91	102
8000K	89	100
10000K	89	99

The TM-30 scores were ok for this light, but it does slightly oversaturate certain colors at 2500-6500K.

Output & accuracy when creating saturated colors

I also wanted to test the light to see how it performed when creating super-saturated colors using the Reflector.

0° – RED

Above, you can see that the light, when using its 45° reflector, recorded an output of 12,800 lx (1190 fc).

As far as creating an accurate 0° RED, the FC-720C was spot on with a reading of 0°.

120° – GREEN

Above, you can see that the light, when using its reflector, recorded an output of 34,900 lx (3250 fc).

As far as creating an accurate 120° GREEN, the FC-720C was spot on with a reading of 120° and 100% saturation.

240° – BLUE

Above, you can see that the light, when using its 45° reflector, recorded an output of 7,130 lx (663 fc).

As far as creating an accurate 240° Blue, the FC-720C was spot on with a reading of 240°.

SSI

SSI (Spectral Similarity Index) was developed by the Sci-Tech Council of the Academy. SSI gives me the ability to set any light as a standard, or use predefined standards (such as CIE D55), and then give other lights an SSI score based upon how well they will match standards such as CIE D55 measure spectral response and compare it directly against an ideal light source.

SSI is a much better way to judge an LED light than CRI or TLCI, although they don’t tell the full story of any light, and you can’t judge a light by SSI scores alone.

SSI is useful for seeing how well different lights will play together. As the Sekonic C-800 Spectromaster can measure SSI, I decided to test out the NANLITE FC-720C to see how it performed.

NANLITE FC-720C 3200K

In this graph, the red bars indicate a perfect Planck 3200K source. The gold bars indicate a perfect 3200K Tungsten source. This lets us compare how close to a perfect 3200K lighting source the NANLITE FC-720C is. Any SSI score in the high 70s, low ’80s is very good for a 3200K LED light. These were very good scores.

As a comparison, above are the SSI scores for the Profoto L600C.

As another comparison, above are the SSI scores for the NANLUX Evoke 600C.

As another comparison, above are the results for the Kelvin Epos 600.

As another comparison, above are the same results for the Prolycht Orion 675 FS.

As another comparison, the results for the Aputure STORM 1000c are above.

NANLITE FC-720C 5600K

In the graph above, the gold bars indicate a perfect CIE D55 source. The red bars indicate a perfect CIE D 5600K source. This lets us compare how close to a perfect 5600K lighting source the FC-720C is. A score in the low 70s is typical for a 5600K LED source. The scores for the FC-720C were arguably a little low for a modern LED light.

As a comparison, above are the scores for the Profoto L600C.

As another comparison, above are the scores for the NANLUX Evoke 600C.

As another comparison, above are the results for the Kelvin Epos 600.

As another comparison, above are the scores for the Prolycht Orion 675 FS.

As another comparison, above are the results for the Aputure STORM 1000c.

The main reason we want to record SSI scores is so we can see how well they match with other lights. As an example, I wanted to see how well the NANLITE FC-720C matched the NANLUX Evoke 600C and Aputure STORM 1000c. Below you can see the results.

As you can see, neither light is anywhere near being a perfect match to the NANLITE FC-720C. This clearly shows you how hard it is to match LED fixtures that have vastly different color engines.

As another test, I thought I would compare those same lights against the NANLITE FC-720C at 3200K. Below you can see the results.

As you can see, at 3200K, the lights were a slightly better match, but again, they weren’t an exact match to the FC-720C.

Okay, so now let’s see how well the NANLITE FC-720C matches itself when used open face and with the DoPchoice Octa 3′ softbox. In theory, these scores should be very high.

As you can see, the scores were almost a perfect match. This shows that you can use modifiers without having to worry that they won’t match.

Again, at 3200K, they were almost a perfect match.

SSI tests are a great way of telling you what lights you own or use will work well together.

Spectral Distribution

NANLITE FC-720C 5600K

Above, you can see the spectral distribution of the NANLITE FC-720C when it is set at 5600K. The spectral distribution isn’t very full, and there are quite a few peaks and troughs.

As a comparison, above, you can see the spectral distribution of the Profoto L600C when it is set at 5600K. The spectral distribution is very, very full, and it has a lot of information from the 420nm to 660 nm range.

As a comparison, above, you can see the spectral distribution of the NANLUX Evoke 600C when it is set at 5600K. The spectral distribution is very full, and it has a lot of information in the 640 nm to 680 nm range that you don’t see in a lot of competing lights.

As another comparison, above you can see the spectral distribution for the Kelvin Epos 600.

As another comparison, above you can see the spectral distribution of the Prolycht Orion 675 FS when it is set at 5600K

As another comparison, above you can see the spectral distribution of the Aputure STORM 1000c.

If you want to see what another really good spectral response looks like for a spotlight at 5600K, above is the result for the Maxima 3.

NANLITE FC-720C 3200K

Above, you can see the spectral distribution of the NANLITE FC-720C when it is set at 3200K. The spectral distribution is ok, but it could be better.

As a comparison, above, you can see the spectral distribution of the Profoto L600C when it is set at 3200K. The spectral distribution is very linear.

As a comparison, above, you can see the spectral distribution of the Evoke 600C when it is set at 3200K. The spectral distribution isn’t overly linear.

As another comparison, above you can see the spectral distribution for the Kelvin Epos 600.

As another comparison, above you can see the spectral distribution of the Prolycht Orion 675 FS when it is set at 3200K

As another comparison, above you can see the spectral distribution of the Aputure STORM 1000c.

Real-World Performance & Quality of Light

As I always say, photometric scores only tell you part of the story. So let’s find out if the scores from the NANLITE FC-720C translate into real world perfromance.

The photometric results can only give me scientific data, and it is much more important for me to see how the light looks and performs, especially with skin tones.

• 

• 

The FC-720C is more than capable of producing great results, and most importantly, it is relatively easy to use and quick to set up. For its price, it can certainly give a lot more expensive fixtures a run for their money.

• 

• 

• 

• 

Firstly, let’s have a look at some tests where I compared the light at 5600K and 3200K at 5600K when shooting a color checker chart (which has seen better days!). The light was set at 5600K and 3200K, and I have set the camera at a preset 5600K WB and a preset 3200K WB. I also did a manual WB, so you can see the differences.

The light does a pretty good job, and there was not a huge difference between running a preset WB and doing a manual WB.

The reflector does have a slight hot spot, and there is some slight color fringing on the edges of the beam.

• 

• 

• 

Above you can see the difference in the type of shadows the light creates when used open face and with its reflector. When used open face, you will get clean shadows. If you use the reflector, then the shadows won’t have as defined outlines.

Above, you can see some photos I took when I placed the FC-720C outside and punched it through a sheer curtain into a room using the included reflector. I have kept the exposure settings the same for all of the shots.

Above, you can see some photos I took when I placed the FC-720C outside and punched it through a sheer curtain into a room using it open face. I have kept the exposure settings the same for all of the shots.

• 

• 

Above, you can see some shots with it pointing down directly at a table.

Above, you can see what the light looks like when punched directly into the ceiling.

• 

• 

I also tried the light with a DoPChoice Octa 3 softbox. While the light won’t fill the softbox completely, it still does enough to provide good results.

• 

• 

In the above example image, I have just used the FC-720C and no other lights. The FC-700C was only set at just 3% output in conjunction with a DoPChoice Octa 3′ softbox running two layers of diffusion and a grid. The FC-720C is more than capable of producing enough output when coupled with a large softbox for interview requirements.

The lights also work well when used with bounce boards or the CRLS reflector system when you combine them with the Fresnel or Nanlite Projector.　

Who is the NANLITE FC-720C aimed at?

Just like most point-source LED lights with this type of power draw, you could use the NANLITE FC-720C for a variety of different applications.

It is priced to appeal to entry-level and mid-end owner-operators who are looking for a jack-of-all-trades lighting solution and are on a budget.

Just like most modern-day LED spotlights, the FC-720C has the ability to be a hard light source or a soft source, depending on what lighting modifiers you use it with. As it features a standard Bowens-S mount, you can use it with a wide array of affordably priced lighting modifiers.

Is the FC-720C likely to appeal to solo shooters and small crews who are looking for a similar light to say an Aputure LS 600c Pro II or an Amaran Ray 660c? I would say yes.

Price & Availability

The NANLITE FC-720C retails for $599.20 USD. This makes it a very affordable option given its output and capabilities.

Below you can see how the price compares to some of the competition:

	Price
NANLITE FC-720C	$599.20 USD
amaran Ray 660c	$699 USD
Profoto L600C	$3,995 USD
NANLUX Evoke 600C	$2,060 USD
Aputure STORM 700x	$1,690 USD
Kelvin Epos 600	$2,999 USD
Aputure LS 600c Pro II	$1,490 USD
Aputure LS 600d Daylight LED Monolight	$872 USD*
Aputure STORM 400x	$1,059 USD
Aputure STORM 1000c	$2,990 USD
Nanlite Forza 720B	$1,519 USD*
Aputure LS 600x Pro Light Storm	$1,393 USD
Nanlite FC500C	$719.20 USD
Nanlite FC720C	$599.20 USD
Godox LITEMONS LA600R	$919 USD
amaran Ray 660c	$699 USD
HIVE LIGHTING Super Hornet 575-C	$5,999 USD
COLBOR CL600R	$1,999 USD

*Currently on sale at B&H as of the 3/04/2026

Conclusion

The NANLITE FC-720C, like most of Nanlite’s fixtures, is a very solid offering that won’t break the bank. Arguably, the light’s greatest strengths are its output and relatively compact size. As I have previously said in lots of lighting reviews, spotlights like this offer a lot of versatility, and they can be used for so many different applications, which is certainly why they are so popular with shooters

Having the ability to use the FC-720C with a wide array of affordably priced lighting modifiers adds to its versatility. Unfortunately, unlike the FC-500C, you can’t use it with the optional FC PowerController to run it remotely from camera batteries. However, a lot of shooters are now using affordable battery solutions from Bluetti, Jackery, DJI, etc. to power lights in the field.

The interface and operating system are fairly basic, but they are easy to use and get the job done. The app is a lot better than it used to be, but there is still some room for improvement. For a lot of shooters, lights like the FC-720C, despite not having the build quality or advanced lighting engines of more expensive fixtures, will still be more than good enough for a wide array of lighting requirements.

The build quality is ok, but it isn’t as robustly made as some of the other competing lights in this space; however, in saying that, a lot of the competition is also significantly more expensive.

The fan noise is a little loud in my opinion, and you need to be aware of that if it’s placed too close to where critical audio is being captured.

The relatively small size and lightweight nature of the fixture make it a great option for anyone who is traveling, as long as you don’t have to run lights remotely without mains power.

The quality and color consistency of NANLITE fixtures over the last 3-4 years have improved a lot. The FC-720C offers fantastic value for money

If you are looking for a full-color COB spotlight that is reasonably lightweight and has a high amount of output, it is a good option if you can’t afford more expensive fixtures like the NANLUX Evoke 600c.